The effects of political advertising on Facebook and Instagram before the 2020 US election

The effects of political advertising on Facebook and Instagram before the 2020 US election


  • Homonoff, H. 2020 political ad spending exploded: did it work?, Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/howardhomonoff/2020/12/08/2020-political-ad-spending-exploded-did-it-work/?sh=584a80d73ce0 (2020).

  • Mac, R. & Warzel, C. Congratulations, Mr. President: Zuckerberg secretly called Trump after the election. BuzzFeed https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/congratulations-zuckerberg-call-trump-election-2016?bfsplash (2018).

  • Coppins, M. The billion-dollar disinformation campaign to reelect the president. The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/03/the-2020-disinformation-war/605530/ (2020).

  • Roose, K., Frenkel, S. & Isaac, M. Don’t tilt scales against Trump, Facebook executive warns. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/07/technology/facebook-trump-2020.html (2020).

  • Dorsey, J. [@jack]. We’ve made the decision to stop all political advertising on Twitter globally [Twitter post]. Twitter https://twitter.com/jack/status/1189634360472829952?lang=en (30 October 2019).

  • Madrigal, A. C. What Facebook did to American democracy. The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/10/what-facebook-did/542502/ (2017).

  • Zacharia, J. Congress should pass Rep. Eshoo’s bill restricting microtargeting of political ads. San Francisco Chronicle https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/article/Congress-should-pass-Rep-Eshoo-s-bill-15371138.php (2020).

  • Auxier, B. 54% of Americans say social media companies shouldn’t allow any political ads. Pew Research Center https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/09/24/54-of-americans-say-social-media-companies-shouldnt-allow-any-political-ads/ (2020).

  • Lima, C. Facebook knew ads, microtargeting could be exploited by politicians. It accepted the risk. The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/10/26/facebook-knew-ads-microtargeting-could-be-exploited-by-politicians-it-accepted-risk/ (2021).

  • Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M., Martin, G. J., Peskowitz, Z. & Ridout, T. N. Political advertising online and offline. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 115, 130–149 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, E. F., Franz, M. M. & Ridout, T. N. Political Advertising in the United States (Routledge, 2021).

  • Haenschen, K. & Jennings, J. Mobilizing millennial voters with targeted internet advertisements: a field experiment. Polit. Commun. 36, 357–375 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper, J. T. The Effects of Mass Communication (Free Press, 1960).

  • Bennett, W. L. & Iyengar, S. A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. J. Commun. 58, 707–731 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G. C. How do campaigns matter? Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 18, 31–47 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, M. et al. A 2 million-person, campaign-wide field experiment shows how digital advertising affects voter turnout. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 332–341 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Broockman, D. E. & Kalla, J. L. Consuming cross-cutting media causes learning and moderatesattitudes: a field experiment with Fox News viewers. J. Pol. 87, 246–261 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Broockman, D. E. & Green, D. P. Do online advertisements increase political candidates’ name recognition or favorability? Evidence from randomized field experiments. Polit. Behav. 36, 263–289 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppock, A., Green, D. P. & Porter, E. Does digital advertising affect vote choice? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Res. Polit. 9, 20531680221076901 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. A. & Theodoridis, A. G. Seeing spots: partisanship, negativity and the conditional receipt of campaign advertisements. Polit. Behav. 40, 965–987 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Turitto, C., Green, D. P., Stobie, B. & Tranter, S. Testing the persuasive effects of digital media: a cluster randomized field experiment. SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3537287 (2014).

  • Shaw, D., Blunt, C. & Seaborn, B. Testing overall and synergistic campaign effects in a partisan statewide election. Polit. Res. Quart. 71, 361–379 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, A. Do online ads influence vote choice? Polit. Commun. 36, 376–393 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Enríquez, J. R., Larreguy, H., Marshall, J. & Simpser, A. Mass political information on social media: Facebook ads, electorate saturation, and electoral accountability in Mexico. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 22, 1678–722 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, M. M. & Ridout, T. N. Does political advertising persuade? Polit. Behav. 29, 465–491 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. A. & Arceneaux, K. Identifying the persuasive effects of presidential advertising. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 51, 957–977 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, C., Nannicini, T. & Trebbi, F. How do voters respond to information? Evidence from a randomized campaign. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 322–353 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Spenkuch, J. L. & Toniatti, D. Political advertising and election results. Quart. J. Econ. 133, 1981–2036 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalla, J. L. & Broockman, D. E. The minimal persuasive effects of campaign contact in general elections: evidence from 49 field experiments. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 112, 148–166 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M. & Shapiro, J. M. Cross-country trends in affective polarization. Rev. Econ. Stat. 106, 557–565 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, M. Media and political polarization. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 16, 101–127 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Törnberg, P. How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2207159119 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlinski, N. et al. The effects of unsubstantiated claims of voter fraud on confidence in elections. J. Exp. Polit. Sci. 10, 34–49 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, J. et al. Understanding the democratic role of perceived online political micro-targeting: longitudinal effects on trust in democracy and political interest. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 19, 435–448 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, F. N. et al. On microtargeting socially divisive ads: a case study of Russia-linked ad campaigns on Facebook. In Proc. Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 140–149 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2019).

  • Zarouali, B., Dobber, T., De Pauw, G. & de Vreese, C. Using a personality-profiling algorithm to investigate political microtargeting: assessing the persuasion effects of personality-tailored ads on social media. Commun. Res. 49, 1066–1091 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberini, F., Redoano, M., Russo, A., Cuevas, A., & Cuevas, R. Politics in the facebook era. Evidence from the 2016 US presidential elections. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 87, 102641 (2025).

  • Coppock, A., Hill, S. J. & Vavreck, L. The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc4046 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., Simon, A. & Valentino, N. Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 88, 829–838 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, S. & Iyengar, S. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate (Free Press, 1995).

  • Clinton, J. D. & Lapinski, J. S. “Targeted” advertising and voter turnout: an experimental study of the 2000 presidential election. J. Polit. 66, 69–96 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess, A. M. et al. How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign? Science 381, 398–404 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyhan, B. et al. Like-minded sources on facebook are prevalent but not polarizing. Nature 620, 137–144 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess, A. M. et al. Reshares on social media amplify political news but do not detectably affect beliefs or opinions. Science 381, 404–408 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Allcott, H. et al. The effects of facebook and instagram on the 2020 election: a deactivation experiment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2321584121 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Look at Facebook and US 2020 Elections (Facebook, 2020); https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/US-2020-Elections-Report.pdf

  • Bruhn, M. & McKenzie, D. In pursuit of balance: randomization in practice in development field experiments. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 1, 200–232 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M. et al. Biden and Trump mentions in Facebook advertising from June 1 through Election Day 2020. Wesleyan University https://doi.org/10.25438/wes02.23546064 (2023).

  • Benjamini, Y., Krieger, A. M. & Yekutieli, D. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika 93, 491–507 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 





  • Content Curated Originally From Here