I’ve been writing on the internet for over a decade now. It has been a platform to build several businesses off the back of my personal brand.
I was recently asked why I spend time building my brand, rather than focusing on building it within my businesses.
Here’s my take
Every business should aim to build an economic moat. A defence against competitors. A hurdle to make taking your castle much more gruelling.
A moat maintains a brand’s edge and is a distinct advantage a company has over others in the market. If it’s deep enough, it protects a company’s market share and profitability.
After network effects, the most powerful moat is a brand.
A brand allows a company to convert commodities into valuable goods. And it takes more than a slap of a logo and some good copy.
Brands are hard to start. The best ones take decades to build. A normal person can’t build a Coca-Cola or a Toyota.
Buying a moat is also hard. The opportunity to buy such a business is rare and expensive by design.
The newest type of moat is a personal moat: a personal brand with a following and a community of people who listen to you.
Until the internet, having a personal brand wasn’t that great. You were reliant on middlemen — TV networks, radio or newspapers — who owned the audience.
The internet has upended this. Everyone has a platform at their fingertips to connect with their desired audience via a blog, podcast, or YouTube. There is no middleman, so the barriers to entry to building a brand have never been lower.
Then why doesn’t everyone build it?
Because building a brand comes with accountability. Every business is accountable to someone or something — its values, its customers, its employees.
And being personally accountable to the market increases the stakes.
As an employee, you can walk away from a brand that has a tarnished, even ruined reputation. But if your personal brand is damaged, you are stuck with that forever.
Building a personal brand is, therefore, risky.
The most accountable people have singular, public and risky brands: Oprah, Trump, Kanye, Musk.
Entrepreneur and investor Naval Ravikant
But what comes with risk also comes with reward.
And herein lies the personal conundrum: The question of whether to build a personal brand versus a company brand. The equity and moat lie in the brand.
So the real question is this: do I invest the efforts in building the moat of my company, or dig the moat around my personal castle?
The trade-off: Personal brand vs company brand
Advantages of building a personal brand
- It’s portable. Projects evolve. Companies may fail. Your personal moat stays with you.
- It compounds. Every article, tweet, or podcast builds trust and distribution.
- It adds halo value. Just ask: how much of Tesla’s market cap is really Elon Musk’s brand equity?
Disadvantages of a personal brand
- It’s time-consuming. You can’t outsource authenticity.
- You’re exposed. With visibility comes criticism and responsibility.
- You can’t hide. A personal brand is a lifelong asset and liability.
So what’s the takeaway?
All things considered, the true value of building a personal brand compared to a company brand is the flexibility it provides.
As we evolve, so do our projects. The personal brand moat is an asset I can carry in my toolbelt and can be leveraged to build other castles.
Entrepreneurship is the ultimate form of self-expression. So, every founder should allocate some time to building their personal brand in addition to their business brand.
Ultimately, no matter how big or small you are — people still buy from people.






